By By Bernard James The Citizen
Reporter
Posted Sunday, April 5 2015
Posted Sunday, April 5 2015
In Summary
The hotel operators contend
that the levy will infringe on their basic human and fundamental rights, which
are guaranteed by the constitution.
Share This Story
Dar es
Salaam. More than 200 tourist hotels have petitioned the High Court to stop
local governments charging the city service levy, which is said to have had a
devastating effect on their business.
Crying foul
over the levy which, they argue, has been imposed contrary to the constitution,
the hotels have asked the court to declare the tax unlawful and direct
municipalities and city authorities to stop collecting it.
The Hotels
Association of Tanzania (HAT), says it has gone to court as a last resort after
several attempts to resolve the longstanding tariff dispute failed.
Municipalities
and city authorities have come up with by-laws requiring local tourist hotels
and tented camps to pay 0.3 per cent of their quarterly sales as service levy.
They argue
that they are just living up to the spirit of the Local Government Finance Act
2003, which empowers them to make laws and impose levies in order to raise
funds for maintenance of infrastructure and finance social projects.
This means
that local companies will pay the fee every March, June, September and
December.
In its
petition, though, HAT argues that tourist hotels and tented camps do not have
to pay the levy. Justices Lawrence Kaduri, Sakieti Kihiyo and Richard Mziray
are hearing the petition. The hotel operators contend that the levy will
infringe on their basic human and fundamental rights, which are guaranteed by
the constitution.
They cite
article 138 of the constitution, which prohibits governments from imposing and
collecting any form of tax without an express provision of the law.
And they
have accused some local government authorities of carrying on with “business as
usual” despite the fact that the law is clear on the matter. The Attorney
General has asked the court to dismiss the petition on the grounds that it is
legally incompetent because it was filed under wrong part of the law.
Attempts to
resolve the tariff row has not worked in the interests of the hoteliers. In
July last year, HAT wrote to the Prime Minister’s Office seeking clarification
on the disputed levy.
It also
asked the PM’s office, which supervises all local governments, to direct the
authorities to stop the levy.
But their
request hit a snag. The PMO’s office responded four months later telling the
petitioners that hotels are no longer exempt from paying service levy.
The PM contends in his response that
Section 35 of the Finance Act 2003, which grants exemption from paying service
levy to hotels, has been repealed by Sections 35 and 36 of the Finance Act of
2012.
But the petitioners argue that the
PMO’s interpretation is wrong in law.
According to HAT, continuing with
the service levy in tourist hotels is against the constitution and Local
Government Finance Act.
Ilala Municipal Council’s letter to
Serena Hotels demanding settlement of an outstanding Sh64 million in city
service levy for six-and-half months is part of the petition.
In a reminder dated 28 January, the
municipal director threatens stern action against the hotel if it fails to pay
up within seven days. The court will on 13 April hear the AG’s arguments on why
he wants the petition dismissed.
No comments:
Post a Comment